The United States has said Zimbabwe’s economic growth potential is boundless, thanks to its significant human talent and rich natural resources.
In a statement on Monday, August 19, shared with NewsDay, US Ambassador Pamela Tremont highlighted America’s longstanding support for Zimbabwe since its independence. This support has included funding for food security initiatives and demining programmes.
Tremont said that since Zimbabwe gained independence in 1980, the US has committed over $5 billion in humanitarian, health, and development assistance, with more than $1 billion allocated in just the past three years. She said:
We have provided US$62 million in assistance in 2024 to counter the effects of the current drought in Zimbabwe.
This funding will address short-term food insecurity and long-term strategies to improve agricultural practices and strengthen community resilience.
On agriculture, US support for demining programmes has made more than 3,000 acres of land available for cultivation.
Together, we are returning land to farmers that had been unsafe for communities and their livestock since Zimbabwe’s hard-fought liberation struggle.
Broad-based economic prosperity is impossible without strong democratic institutions, good public health, and regional security.
The United States supports these things because they are critical elements for Zimbabweans to chart their own future.
Tremont said the United States aims to strengthen its economic ties with Zimbabwe to advance mutual interests between the two countries. Said Tremont:
Our hope is to collaborate on improving the investment climate in Zimbabwe to expand economic opportunities for people and communities, forge stronger business linkages and attract investors to look closely at Zimbabwe’s educated labour force and long-term growth potential.
We believe the government and people of Zimbabwe need to share their story that Zimbabwe is a good business partner that combats corruption, provides certainty in regulatory, monetary and tax policy and applies equal justice under the law.
Zimbabwe has a rich history, enormous human talent and abundant natural resources. It shows promise as a great leader in southern Africa and a vibrant participant in global conversations.
Zimbabwe’s potential is limitless. We look forward to deepening our partnership to advance our mutual interests.
In its 2024 Zimbabwe Investment Climate report, the US State Department’s Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs noted that inconsistencies in policy, corruption, administrative delays, and high costs are significant obstacles to business development in Zimbabwe.
More: Pindula News
reply · 7 months ago
There are several reasons why some people in Zimbabwe continue to support ZANU-PF, despite concerns about the party's governance, human rights record, and economic management. Some factors that contribute to ongoing support for ZANU-PF include:
1. **Historical Legacy:** ZANU-PF has a long history in Zimbabwean politics, playing a central role in the country's independence struggle against colonial rule. Some individuals may continue to support the party out of a sense of loyalty to its historical legacy and the role it played in liberating the country.
2. **Patronage and Clientelism:** The ZANU-PF party has been known to use patronage networks and clientelistic practices to co-opt support from various sectors of society. Some individuals may continue to support the party in exchange for economic opportunities, social benefits, or access to resources provided by the party.
3. **Rural and Urban Divide:** There is a divide between rural and urban areas in Zimbabwe, with ZANU-PF traditionally receiving more support in rural regions. Some rural communities may continue to support the party due to historical ties, promises of land reforms, or perceived neglect by opposition parties.
4. **Election Rigging and Authoritarian Practices:** ZANU-PF has been accused of using authoritarian tactics, election rigging, and intimidation to maintain power. Some individuals may support the party out of fear of reprisals, coercion, or manipulation of the electoral process.
5. **Economic Policies:** Despite criticism of its economic management, ZANU-PF has implemented policies that resonate with some segments of the population, such as land redistribution programs and subsidies for certain sectors. Some individuals may support the party based on perceived economic benefits or promises of economic empowerment.
6. **Perception of Stability:** Some individuals may view ZANU-PF as a party that provides stability and continuity in a context of political and economic uncertainty. The party's long-standing presence in Zimbabwean politics may be perceived as a source of security and order by some supporters.
It is essential to recognize that political support can be influenced by a complex interplay of historical, socio-economic, and psychological factors. Understanding the reasons behind continued support for ZANU-PF is crucial in engaging with diverse perspectives, building coalitions, and promoting dialogue and accountability in Zimbabwean politics.
reply · 7 months ago
If the USA were to stop providing financial assistance to Zimbabwe, it could have several potential consequences for the country. Some potential outcomes include:
1. Humanitarian Crisis: Without the financial support provided by the USA, Zimbabwe could face challenges in addressing urgent humanitarian needs such as food insecurity, healthcare, and access to clean water. The lack of funding could exacerbate existing poverty and vulnerability in the country, leading to a worsening humanitarian crisis.
2. Economic Impact: USA assistance plays a role in supporting economic development and growth in Zimbabwe. If this funding were to be withdrawn, it could have negative effects on the country's economy, including reduced investment in infrastructure, job creation, and social services. The withdrawal of financial support could also lead to a decrease in confidence among other donor countries and international financial institutions.
3. Democratic Backsliding: USA assistance supports democracy and governance programs in Zimbabwe aimed at promoting democratic values, human rights, and accountable governance. The withdrawal of funding could potentially weaken these efforts, leading to a deterioration in democratic practices, increased political repression, and a decline in respect for human rights in the country.
Overall, the cessation of USA financial assistance to Zimbabwe could have significant negative consequences for the country, including impacts on humanitarian conditions, economic development, and democratic governance. It is important for the USA and other international donors to consider the potential implications of withdrawing aid and to work towards sustainable solutions that support the well-being and development of the people of Zimbabwe.
1
