CIMAS Ordered To Compensate Cancer Patient Whose Kidneys Were Destroyed By Wrong Medication
A leading medical aid society, CIMAS has been ordered to compensate a cancer patient whose kidneys were destroyed after being supplied with the wrong medication for two weeks.
CIMAS has been ordered to pay ZW$500 000 to the patient, Caroline Nyika, after it was proved that the medical aid society gave her hair loss medication, instead of breast cancer medication for two weeks.
The order was initially granted by a magistrate after Nyika filed a ZW$1 million lawsuit against CIMAS.
The magistrate reduced the claim on grounds that Nyika was already suffering from a chronic disease.
CIMAS, however, took the matter up to the High Court where it filed an appeal arguing that Nyika was not entitled to “any compensation” and the magistrate erred in concluding they were liable.
Get Pindula News on our WhatsApp Channel
Subscribe here: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va84dngJP21B2nWeyM3v
High Court judges of appeal, Justices Fatima Maxwell and Amy Tsanga ruled that CIMAS should simply pay because the company had already admitted the mistake. The judges ruled:
This ground of appeal shows that appellant is desperately clutching a straw in an effort to reverse the lower court’s decision.
The appeal has no merit at all and it cannot succeed. The appeal fails and the following order is made.
According to court papers seen by NewZimbabwe.com, Nyika developed kidney failure after taking the wrong medication.
She then initiated a lawsuit claiming ZW$1 million from CIMAS.
The matter was heard by a magistrate who ruled that CIMAS was at fault.
The magistrate dismissed CIMAS’ claim that there were no side effects on the basis that there was no evidence that the medication is safe for women as clearly indicated that it was to be taken by men only.
The lower court found CIMAS liable to pay the damages for the pain and suffering that Nyika went through because of its negligence.
At the onset of the trial at the lower court, the medical aid company admitted to having dispensed the wrong medication but argued that Nyika had not provided enough evidence to show that it was the side effects of the wrong medication she was given.